Skip to content

Broker-Dealer Regulation & Litigation Insights

  • About Us
  • Contributors
  • Resources
  • Presentations
  • Visit the Faegre Drinker website

The Continuing Convergence of Retail and Retirement Regulatory Oversight

Last month the SEC’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE) issued its “2019 Examination Priorities.” The release of OCIE’s 2019 Priorities this year was earlier than in years past. In retrospect, the date of issuance being the last day before the vast majority of the SEC staff was furloughed may just be coincidental, but the federal government shutdown allowed the industry more time to study OCIE’s 2019 Priorities for compliance planning for the upcoming year. Another impact of the shutdown and furloughs in an area directly related to OCIE’s first priority is that the SEC’s efforts and the timing of the finalization of the Reg BI proposals have very likely been slowed as well. The recent ending of the SEC furloughs and OCIE’s continuing prioritization of retail and retirement regulatory issues presents us with an opportune time to re-visit these important topics.


In this Priorities Letter, OCIE continues and expands on Chairman Clayton’s prioritization of “Main Street” issues. Specifically, the first topic of the letter is “Matters of importance to retail investors, including seniors and those saving for retirement.” This post focuses on and summarizes these issues and weaves in related perspectives pertaining to ERISA and IRAs on fees and expenses, conflicts of interest, and senior investors.

OCIE’s 2019 Priorities, consistent with OCIE’s past practices, do not delve into the same level of detail that FINRA provides with its annual Regulatory and Examination Priorities Letter to FINRA member firms. So we are left to analyze the summary information provided, and compare and contrast it with what we know about the applicable regulations covering retirement accounts.

Regarding fees and expenses, OCIE’s 2019 Priorities provide:

Fees and Expenses: Disclosure of the Costs of Investing

Every dollar an investor pays in fees and expenses is a dollar not invested. It is critically important that investors are provided with proper disclosures of the fees and expenses they pay for products and services and that financial professionals accurately calculate and charge fees in accordance with these disclosures. OCIE will continue to review fees charged to advisory accounts, ensuring that the fees are assessed in accordance with the client agreements and firm disclosures. For these examinations, OCIE will select firms with practices or business models that may create increased risks of inadequately disclosed fees, expenses, or other charges. With respect to mutual fund share classes, OCIE will continue to evaluate financial incentives for financial professionals that may influence their selection of particular share classes. In addition, OCIE remains focused on investment advisers participating in wrap fee programs, which charge investors a single bundled fee for both advisory and brokerage services. Continued areas of interest include the adequacy of disclosures and brokerage practices.

ERISA requires that qualifying “ERISA Fiduciary Advisers” recommend only products and services with reasonable costs. The recommendation of excessively expensive investment products or services, or insurance or annuity products, would be a breach of fiduciary duty by ERISA Fiduciary Advisers. This would apply to recommending a share class that was more expensive than what was reasonable for the plan. There is not a separate ERISA fiduciary duty for IRAs. In other words, the standard of care advice to IRA owners would be governed by the securities laws. However, the prohibited transaction rules in the Internal Revenue Code apply to fiduciary advice to IRA owners that increases the adviser’s compensation (e.g., 12b-1 fees, revenue sharing or payments from custodians).

Regarding ERISA disclosure requirements, there is a separate disclosure regime for ERISA service providers, including investment advisers, to ERISA retirement plans. This is referred to as the “408(b)(2)” disclosure requirement. It requires disclosure of services, compensation and status. There is not a separate disclosure requirement for services to IRAs.

Regarding conflicts of interest, OCIE’s 2019 Priorities provide:

Conflicts of Interest

As fiduciaries, investment advisers have a duty to act and provide advice in the best interests of their clients. Ensuring that investment advisers are acting in a manner consistent with their fiduciary duty and meeting their contractual obligations to their clients is paramount to maintaining investor confidence in the markets and investment professionals.

OCIE further provides that conflicts of interest provide incentives for financial professionals to recommend certain types of products and services and that OCIE examinations will focus on the following in their reviews: use of affiliated service providers and products because these arrangements present conflicts of interest related to, among other areas, portfolio management practices and compensation arrangements; and borrowing funds from clients because this presents a number of conflicts of interest for an investment adviser, and where examiners observe this practice, emphasis will be on whether adequate disclosures were made.

Financial conflicts of interest are “prohibited transactions” under ERISA. At this time, there is a non-enforcement policy at the Department of Labor (DOL) for conflicts resulting from nondiscretionary fiduciary advice, so long as the adviser adheres to the DOL’s Best Interest Standard of Care. But there is not a similar policy for discretionary investment management. For IRAs, if an adviser satisfies the DOL’s fiduciary definition, then similar rules apply under the Internal Revenue Code. These rules apply to proprietary investments, and separate prohibited transaction rules also apply to loans to the adviser.

Lastly, but perhaps most notably, the SEC continues to increase its focus on retirement accounts; an area of the industry for which the SEC historically deferred to ERISA regulation and DOL oversight. As such, OCIE’s 2019 Priorities provide:

Senior Investors and Retirement Accounts and Products

OCIE will conduct examinations that review how broker-dealers oversee their interactions with senior investors, including their ability to identify financial exploitation of seniors. In examinations of investment advisers, OCIE will continue to review the services and products offered to seniors and those saving for retirement. These examinations will focus on, among other things, compliance programs of investment advisers, the appropriateness of certain investment recommendations to seniors, and the supervision by firms of their employees and independent representatives.

ERISA does not have specific regulations or practices for senior investors; however, the ERISA guidance discussed above applies. For example, ERISA’s fiduciary and prohibited transaction rules can apply to rollover recommendations to retirees (i.e., to “senior” investors). While not explicit, rollover recommendations are likely also included in the SEC’s focus on senior investors.

OCIE’s 2019 priorities continue the mantra from Chairman Clayton to prioritize retail and retirement investor issues as the main priority of his chairmanship. This prioritization has led to a continuing convergence of the SEC’s priorities with the DOL and ERISA. As we move through 2019 and Reg BI continues to move toward its expected finalization, we expect this convergence to continue. We will continue to monitor this and report important developments here on our blog.

The material contained in this communication is informational, general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. The material contained in this communication should not be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances. This communication was published on the date specified and may not include any changes in the topics, laws, rules or regulations covered. Receipt of this communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions, this communication may be considered attorney advertising.

Subscribe and Receive Alerts to New Articles

SUBSCRIBE
January 31, 2019
Written by: Fred Reish
Category: Best Interest Standard of Care, Compliance, Conflicts of Interest, Enforcement, Examination, Fees, Fiduciary, Fiduciary Duty, IRA, OCIE, Prohibited Transactions, Retirement Account, Rollovers, SEC, Seniors

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Fiduciary Status for the Unwary
Next Next post: Alert: FINRA’s 529 Plan Share Class Initiative to Self-Report

Subscribe to Alerts

Recent Posts

  • New Year’s Priorities: FINRA Releases its 2023 Report on its Examination and Risk Monitoring Program
  • Managing IRAs: Charging Different Fees for Different Investments
  • FINRA Is Conducting a Targeted Exam of “Crypto Assets”
  • Recent State Fiduciary and Best Interest Developments
  • Rollover Recommendations – Do the SEC and DOL Requirements Align?

Categories

  • 12b-1 Fees
  • 3270
  • 3280
  • 3290
  • Anti-Money Laundering
  • Arbitration
  • BD
  • Best Execution
  • Best Interest Contract Exemption
  • Best Interest Standard of Care
  • Business Continuity Planning
  • Churning
  • Class Certification
  • Compensation Issues
  • Compliance
  • Concurrent jurisdiction
  • Conflicts of Interest
  • Congress
  • Covered class actions
  • Covered securities
  • Credit
  • Cryptocurrencies
  • Customer Due Diligence Rule
  • Customer Protection
  • Cybersecurity
  • Dark Pools
  • Data Integrity
  • DOL Fiduciary Rule
  • Elder Abuse
  • Enforcement
  • Event Study
  • Examination
  • Exchange-Traded Funds (“ETF”)
  • exemptions
  • Fair Pricing
  • Fees
  • Fiduciary
  • Fiduciary Duty
  • Financial Services
  • FinCEN
  • FINRA
  • FINRA 2018 Annual Regulatory and Examination Priorities Letter
  • FINRA 360
  • FINRA Code of Arbitration Procedure 12204
  • FINRA Code of Arbitration Procedure 13204
  • FINRA Notice 13-45
  • FINRA Regulatory Notice 16-25
  • FINRA Rule 12200
  • FINRA Rule 13200
  • FINRA Rule 2111
  • FINRA Rule 2165
  • FINRA Rule 2232
  • FINRA Rule 3310(c)
  • FINRA Rule 4210
  • FINRA Rule 4512
  • FINRA Summary Report
  • Fixed Income
  • Fraud
  • Goldman v. City of Reno, 747 F.3d 733(2014)
  • Goldman v. Golden Empire Schools Financing, 767 F.3d 210(2014)
  • IA
  • Impartial Conduct Standards
  • In the Matter of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Respondent (AWC 2009020188101/January 25, 2012)
  • Initial Coin Offerings
  • Investment Recommendation
  • Investor
  • IRA
  • Liquidity
  • Manipulation
  • Margin
  • Market Access
  • Market Access Controls
  • Mortgage
  • Mutual Funds
  • New FINRA Rule
  • OCIE
  • Office of the Solicitor General
  • Options
  • Outside Activities
  • Outside Business Activities (“OBA”)
  • Policies and Procedures
  • Price Impact
  • Private Securities Transactions (“PST”)
  • Private Securities Transactions of an Associated Person”
  • Prohibited Transactions
  • Prudence
  • Quantitative Suitability
  • Reading Health v. JP Morgan, No. 16-4234 (3d Cir. Aug. 7, 2018)
  • Reasonable Fees
  • Recommendation
  • Regulation Best Interest
  • Regulation SHO
  • Regulatory Notice 18-13
  • Retirement Account
  • Risk
  • Rollovers
  • SEC
  • SEC 2018 National Exam Program Examination Priorities
  • SEC Reg BI
  • SEC RIA Interpretation
  • Securities Act of 1933
  • Securities Class Action
  • Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (SLUSA)
  • Senior Safe Act
  • Seniors
  • Service Providers
  • Short Sales
  • Suitability
  • supervision
  • Supreme Court
  • Surveillance
  • Technology Governance
  • UBS v. Carilion Clinic, 706 F.3d 319(2013)
  • Uncategorized
  • Unit Investment Trusts (“UIT”)
  • Verification of Assets and Liabilities

archives

  • 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
  • 2022
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
  • 2021
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
  • 2020
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
  • 2019
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
  • 2018
    • December 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
  • 2017
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
  • About Us
  • Contributors
  • Resources
  • Presentations
  • Visit the Faegre Drinker website

© 2023 Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All Rights Reserved. Lawyer Advertising.
Privacy Policy

We use cookies to improve your experience with our website. By browsing our site, you are agreeing to the use of cookies. For more information about how we use cookies, please review our privacy policy and cookie policy. OK
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT