Skip to content

Broker-Dealer Regulation & Litigation Insights

  • About Us
  • Contributors
  • Resources
  • Presentations
  • Visit the Faegre Drinker website

FINRA 2018 Annual Regulatory and Examination Priorities Letter Makes No Mention of a Fiduciary Duty for Brokers

FINRA released its 2018 Annual Regulatory and Examination Priorities Letter (Priorities Letter) on January 8, 2018. While FINRA advises that it can change its priorities in response to circumstances, the purpose of the Priorities Letter is to permit broker-dealers to plan their compliance, supervisory and risk management programs and to prepare for FINRA examinations. Therefore, this Priorities Letter is significant both in what it says and in what it has chosen not to say including failing to discuss FINRA’s views regarding a “fiduciary standard.”

For 2018, FINRA will focus on:

  • Fraud – including insider trading, microcap pump and dump schemes which target seniors, issuer fraud and, Ponzi schemes;
  • High-Risk Firms and Brokers – hiring and training practices, including the danger “firms and brokers pose to investors, including unsophisticated or senior investors” with a “focus on recommendations for speculative or complex products by high-risk brokers to investors who may not have the necessary sophistication, experience or investment objectives;”
  • Operational and Financial Risks – business continuity planning, customer protection and verification of assets and liabilities, technology governance, cybersecurity, anti-money laundering, liquidity risk and Short sales;
  • Sales Practice Risks – suitability, initial coin offerings and cryptocurrencies, use of margin and securities backed lines of credit;
  • Market Integrity – manipulation, best execution, regulation SHO, fixed income data integrity, options, market access, alternative trading system surveillance, and report cards; and,
  • New Rules –
    • Financial Exploitation of Specified Adults: FINRA Rule 2165 (effective February 5, 2018).
    • Amendments to FINRA Rule 4512 requireing members to make reasonable efforts to obtain the name of and contact information for a trusted contact person for a non-institutional customer’s account. (effective February 5, 2018).
    • The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)’s Customer Due Diligence Rule (CDD Rule): Firms have until May 11, 2018, to comply with FinCEN’s CDD Rule.9. FinCEN issued the CDD Rule to clarify and strengthen customer due diligence for covered financial institutions, including broker-dealers. In the CDD Rule, FinCEN identifies four components of customer due diligence: (1) customer identification and verification; (2) beneficial ownership identification and verification; (3) understanding the nature and purpose of customer relationships; and (4) ongoing monitoring for reporting suspicious transactions and, on a risk basis, maintaining and updating customer information.
    • Amendments to FINRA Rule 2232 (Customer Confirmations): requiring mark-up or mark-down; a reference, and/or a FINRA hyperlink containing publicly available trading data for the specific security that was traded and (2) the execution time of the transaction, expressed to the second. (effective May 14, 2018).
    • Amendments to FINRA Rule 4210 establishing margin requirements for covered agency transactions including to-be-announced (TBA) transactions, inclusive of (1) adjustable rate mortgage (ARM) transactions, (2) specified pool transactions, and (3) transactions in collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs); issued in conformity with a program of an agency or government-sponsored enterprise (GSE) (effective June 25, 2018).
    • Consolidated FINRA Registration Rules: The consolidated FINRA registration rules (FINRA Rules 1210 through 1240) (effective October 1, 2018.)

It is clear that FINRA intends to spend a significant amount of time ensuring that senior investors are protected. In fact, FINRA indicates that an area of focus will be the “rollovers of qualified plans into non-qualified accounts [Individual Retirement Accounts (“IRA”)] for senior investors.”

The Department of Labor (DOL) Fiduciary Duty Rule has been a focus of industry discussion for the past two years and became applicable on June 9, 2017. That rule mandates that rollover recommendations to IRAs, which will be one of FINRA’s area of focus, are subject to a fiduciary standard. However, nowhere in FINRA’s Priorities Letter is there any discussion of a “fiduciary duty” or supervision of such a duty. Rather, FINRA reemphasizes that these rollover recommendations will be reviewed under the industry’s “suitability” standard:

Employer-sponsored retirement plans play a critical role in many individuals’ retirement planning and for this reason will be an important area of focus for FINRA. In this regard, FINRA will focus on the suitability of firms’ and registered representatives’ recommendations made to plan participants, including Individual Retirement Account rollover recommendations involving securities transactions. [Emphasis added].

Regulatory Notice 13-45 governs rollovers to IRAs and sets forth the items which FINRA mandates brokers consider in his/her suitability analysis regarding rollovers. Interestingly, those items are virtually identical to the DOL’s listed factors for the best interest standard of care relating to rollovers. Yet the DOL is not mentioned in the Priorities Letter.

Similarly, FINRA does not discuss “conflict of interest” with regard to recommendations relating to retirement funds. Instead, the only discussion of “conflict of interest” in FINRA’s Priorities Letter is one relating to best execution and the pricing of fixed income securities (retirement accounts are not distinguished, nor is broker compensation mentioned). FINRA advises that:

FINRA 2018 Regulatory and Examination Priorities Letter will review how broker-dealers manage the conflict of interest that exists between their duty of best execution and their own financial interests, including whether the broker dealers’ procedures provide for a regular and rigorous evaluation of the execution quality they are likely to obtain from the market centers trading a security. We will also expand our review of execution quality and fair pricing in fixed income securities. For example, we expect to implement surveillance patterns that focus on fair pricing and best execution in transactions in Treasury securities.

FINRA has emphasized that the standard of its review for 2018 will be its own standard of “suitability.” This may be FINRA reasserting its dominance over enforcement actions against broker-dealers or it may merely be FINRA’s deference to the SEC to lead the way in establishing a fiduciary standard. The SEC has not yet issued its priorities letter and FINRA may adjust its focus if the SEC indicates that a fiduciary duty standard will be enforced in 2018.

However, for now FINRA will review broker-dealers under a “suitability” standard.

Look for our future blogs where we will discuss in more detail the specific priorities listed in FINRA 2018 Priorities Letter and the priorities of the SEC in 2018.

The material contained in this communication is informational, general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. The material contained in this communication should not be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances. This communication was published on the date specified and may not include any changes in the topics, laws, rules or regulations covered. Receipt of this communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions, this communication may be considered attorney advertising.

Subscribe and Receive Alerts to New Articles

SUBSCRIBE
January 23, 2018
Written by: Sandra D. Grannum, Fred Reish and Jamie L. Helman
Category: Anti-Money Laundering, Best Execution, Business Continuity Planning, Conflicts of Interest, Credit, Cryptocurrencies, Customer Due Diligence Rule, Customer Protection, Cybersecurity, Data Integrity, Fair Pricing, Fiduciary Duty, FinCEN, FINRA 2018 Annual Regulatory and Examination Priorities Letter, FINRA Notice 13-45, FINRA Rule 2165, FINRA Rule 2232, FINRA Rule 4210, FINRA Rule 4512, Fixed Income, Fraud, Initial Coin Offerings, Investor, Liquidity, Manipulation, Margin, Market Access, Mortgage, Options, Recommendation, Regulation SHO, Risk, SEC, Seniors, Short Sales, Suitability, Surveillance, Technology Governance, Verification of Assets and Liabilities

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Fiduciary Rule Myths
Next Next post: Reasonable Compensation

Subscribe to Alerts

Recent Posts

  • New Year’s Priorities: FINRA Releases its 2023 Report on its Examination and Risk Monitoring Program
  • Managing IRAs: Charging Different Fees for Different Investments
  • FINRA Is Conducting a Targeted Exam of “Crypto Assets”
  • Recent State Fiduciary and Best Interest Developments
  • Rollover Recommendations – Do the SEC and DOL Requirements Align?

Categories

  • 12b-1 Fees
  • 3270
  • 3280
  • 3290
  • Anti-Money Laundering
  • Arbitration
  • BD
  • Best Execution
  • Best Interest Contract Exemption
  • Best Interest Standard of Care
  • Business Continuity Planning
  • Churning
  • Class Certification
  • Compensation Issues
  • Compliance
  • Concurrent jurisdiction
  • Conflicts of Interest
  • Congress
  • Covered class actions
  • Covered securities
  • Credit
  • Cryptocurrencies
  • Customer Due Diligence Rule
  • Customer Protection
  • Cybersecurity
  • Dark Pools
  • Data Integrity
  • DOL Fiduciary Rule
  • Elder Abuse
  • Enforcement
  • Event Study
  • Examination
  • Exchange-Traded Funds (“ETF”)
  • exemptions
  • Fair Pricing
  • Fees
  • Fiduciary
  • Fiduciary Duty
  • Financial Services
  • FinCEN
  • FINRA
  • FINRA 2018 Annual Regulatory and Examination Priorities Letter
  • FINRA 360
  • FINRA Code of Arbitration Procedure 12204
  • FINRA Code of Arbitration Procedure 13204
  • FINRA Notice 13-45
  • FINRA Regulatory Notice 16-25
  • FINRA Rule 12200
  • FINRA Rule 13200
  • FINRA Rule 2111
  • FINRA Rule 2165
  • FINRA Rule 2232
  • FINRA Rule 3310(c)
  • FINRA Rule 4210
  • FINRA Rule 4512
  • FINRA Summary Report
  • Fixed Income
  • Fraud
  • Goldman v. City of Reno, 747 F.3d 733(2014)
  • Goldman v. Golden Empire Schools Financing, 767 F.3d 210(2014)
  • IA
  • Impartial Conduct Standards
  • In the Matter of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Respondent (AWC 2009020188101/January 25, 2012)
  • Initial Coin Offerings
  • Investment Recommendation
  • Investor
  • IRA
  • Liquidity
  • Manipulation
  • Margin
  • Market Access
  • Market Access Controls
  • Mortgage
  • Mutual Funds
  • New FINRA Rule
  • OCIE
  • Office of the Solicitor General
  • Options
  • Outside Activities
  • Outside Business Activities (“OBA”)
  • Policies and Procedures
  • Price Impact
  • Private Securities Transactions (“PST”)
  • Private Securities Transactions of an Associated Person”
  • Prohibited Transactions
  • Prudence
  • Quantitative Suitability
  • Reading Health v. JP Morgan, No. 16-4234 (3d Cir. Aug. 7, 2018)
  • Reasonable Fees
  • Recommendation
  • Regulation Best Interest
  • Regulation SHO
  • Regulatory Notice 18-13
  • Retirement Account
  • Risk
  • Rollovers
  • SEC
  • SEC 2018 National Exam Program Examination Priorities
  • SEC Reg BI
  • SEC RIA Interpretation
  • Securities Act of 1933
  • Securities Class Action
  • Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (SLUSA)
  • Senior Safe Act
  • Seniors
  • Service Providers
  • Short Sales
  • Suitability
  • supervision
  • Supreme Court
  • Surveillance
  • Technology Governance
  • UBS v. Carilion Clinic, 706 F.3d 319(2013)
  • Uncategorized
  • Unit Investment Trusts (“UIT”)
  • Verification of Assets and Liabilities

archives

  • 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
  • 2022
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
  • 2021
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
  • 2020
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
  • 2019
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
  • 2018
    • December 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
  • 2017
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
  • About Us
  • Contributors
  • Resources
  • Presentations
  • Visit the Faegre Drinker website

© 2023 Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All Rights Reserved. Lawyer Advertising.
Privacy Policy

We use cookies to improve your experience with our website. By browsing our site, you are agreeing to the use of cookies. For more information about how we use cookies, please review our privacy policy and cookie policy. OK
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT