Skip to content

Broker-Dealer Regulation & Litigation Insights

  • About Us
  • Contributors
  • Resources
  • Presentations
  • Visit the Faegre Drinker website

SEC Exams for 2021 to Focus on Climate and ESG, Reg BI, Crypto, & More

The SEC’s Division of Examination’s (formerly OCIE) annual announcement of its exam priorities is always noteworthy. It provides helpful insight into this division’s thinking and can serve as a roadmap for regulated entities to focus their compliance and supervision planning. The announcement of these priorities is even more important following a change in the presidential administration and the changes at the Commission that inevitably follow. Not surprisingly, the recently announced Division of Examination priorities for 2021 (summarized below) align with the Biden Administration’s policy priorities and key trends in the financial landscape.

Climate-Related Risks: Examinations will carefully consider environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues, including climate change. In the same way that the Division of Examinations previously focused on entities’ plans and disclosures related to the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, the Division announced that it will scrutinize business continuity plans to ensure that they “account for the growing physical and other relevant risks associated with climate change.” The Division will be looking for “maturation and improvements to these plans” to ensure that “registrants are considering effective practices to help improve responses to large-scale events.” The announcement of this examination focus also coincides with the Division of Enforcement’s announcement of the creation of a Climate and ESG Task Force.

This focus falls within the Division of Examination’s larger priority of examining information security concerns and cyber-attack risks, which have gained increased importance as remote work has increased and third-party vendors have continued to provide more services to investment advisors, broker-dealers and other registrants.

FinTech, Innovation and Digital Assets: As anticipated, the Division will focus on digital assets such as Bitcoin and tokens offered as part of initial coin offerings (ICOs).  This is in keeping with its broader push to examine the multitude of issues presented by the rapidly evolving FinTech landscape, including whether and under what circumstances such assets fall within the definition of a security. For registrants involved in digital assets, the Division will look at whether such assets are in the best interest of investors, trading practices, assets safety, valuation practices, the sufficiency of compliance programs and controls, and the supervision of outside business activities. Last week, the Division even issued a Risk Alert about digital assets that echoed many of these examination priorities.

The Division is also planning to closely monitor how new technologies and services ― such as “robo-advisers,” the use of mobile applications, fractional share purchases, and other emerging trends ― are being properly monitored for their own risks, as well as being integrated into registrants’ existing monitoring and compliance programs.

Retail Investors and Regulation BI: The Division will continue to focus on efforts designed to protect retail investors. Chief among these efforts will be ensuring that broker-dealers and Registered Investment Advisers (RIAs) are, respectively, satisfying the requirements of Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI) and the Interpretation Regarding Standard of Conduct for Investment Advisers. Exams for broker-dealers will have an expanded scope this year, including enhanced transaction testing.  Among other things, this will include careful evaluation of policies and procedures to address issues such as conflicts of interest and the additional requirements of Reg BI. RIAs will be scrutinized as to conflicts of interest, risks related to fees and expenses, best execution, disclosure of compensation arrangements, recommendations regarding complex products, and, overall, whether recommendations are in the best interest of clients in light of their investment objectives.

Examinations will focus on certain vulnerable retail investor groups, including seniors, teachers, the military, and those saving for retirement. Product recommendations and sales practices will be carefully considered, especially when complex products are involved. Furthermore, the Division will look to ensure that fee calculations are carried out properly and that customers receive all discounts and fee refunds they are entitled to. Due to their importance to retail investors, the Division also will focus on mutual funds and ETFs, municipal and other fixed income securities, and microcap securities.

Other Priorities: The Division also made note of its focus on (1) anti-money-laundering programs, sufficiently designed to identify suspicious activity; (2) LIBOR transition preparations, designed to mitigate risk, confusion, and disruption when the use of the benchmark rate is discontinued; (3) examining key elements of the market infrastructure, including risk-based exams of clearing agencies, assessments of the national securities exchanges, the operations of transfer agents, and the improvement in the technology infrastructure for these entities; and (4) monitoring FINRA and MSRB to ensure that their regulatory programs are operating effectively.

Registrants should bear these issues in mind as they evaluate the sufficiency of their compliance program for 2021 and beyond. Registrants should consider engaging a compliance firm or qualified legal counsel to help them navigate the dynamic legal environment resulting from the new Administration.

A version of this blog post was originally published on March 9, 2021 in Faegre Drinker’s Enforcement Highlights blog.

Subscribe and Receive Alerts to New Articles

SUBSCRIBE
March 15, 2021
Written by: Michael MacPhail and David W. Porteous
Category: OCIE, Regulation Best Interest, SEC
Tags: Cyptocurrency, ESG, FinTech, SEC Examinations

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Broker-Dealer Regulation & Litigation Digest – Winter 2021
Next Next post: Broker-Dealer Services to Plans and IRAs: Impact of the DOL Fiduciary Advice Exemption

Subscribe to Alerts

Recent Posts

  • Having a Senior Moment
  • Broker-Dealer Regulation & Litigation Digest – Winter 2022
  • The Convergence Continues: SEC Staff Bulletin on Standards of Conduct for B-Ds and RIAs
  • Recent State Fiduciary and Best Interest Developments: New Mexico Becomes the 20th State to Adopt an NAIC Best Interest Model
  • Exam Time: FINRA Releases its 2022 Report on its Examination and Risk Monitoring Program

Categories

  • 12b-1 Fees
  • 3270
  • 3280
  • 3290
  • Anti-Money Laundering
  • Arbitration
  • BD
  • Best Execution
  • Best Interest Contract Exemption
  • Best Interest Standard of Care
  • Business Continuity Planning
  • Churning
  • Class Certification
  • Compensation Issues
  • Compliance
  • Concurrent jurisdiction
  • Conflicts of Interest
  • Congress
  • Covered class actions
  • Covered securities
  • Credit
  • Cryptocurrencies
  • Customer Due Diligence Rule
  • Customer Protection
  • Cybersecurity
  • Dark Pools
  • Data Integrity
  • DOL Fiduciary Rule
  • Elder Abuse
  • Enforcement
  • Event Study
  • Examination
  • Exchange-Traded Funds (“ETF”)
  • exemptions
  • Fair Pricing
  • Fees
  • Fiduciary
  • Fiduciary Duty
  • Financial Services
  • FinCEN
  • FINRA
  • FINRA 2018 Annual Regulatory and Examination Priorities Letter
  • FINRA 360
  • FINRA Code of Arbitration Procedure 12204
  • FINRA Code of Arbitration Procedure 13204
  • FINRA Notice 13-45
  • FINRA Regulatory Notice 16-25
  • FINRA Rule 12200
  • FINRA Rule 13200
  • FINRA Rule 2111
  • FINRA Rule 2165
  • FINRA Rule 2232
  • FINRA Rule 3310(c)
  • FINRA Rule 4210
  • FINRA Rule 4512
  • FINRA Summary Report
  • Fixed Income
  • Fraud
  • Goldman v. City of Reno, 747 F.3d 733(2014)
  • Goldman v. Golden Empire Schools Financing, 767 F.3d 210(2014)
  • IA
  • Impartial Conduct Standards
  • In the Matter of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Respondent (AWC 2009020188101/January 25, 2012)
  • Initial Coin Offerings
  • Investment Recommendation
  • Investor
  • IRA
  • Liquidity
  • Manipulation
  • Margin
  • Market Access
  • Market Access Controls
  • Mortgage
  • Mutual Funds
  • New FINRA Rule
  • OCIE
  • Office of the Solicitor General
  • Options
  • Outside Activities
  • Outside Business Activities (“OBA”)
  • Policies and Procedures
  • Price Impact
  • Private Securities Transactions (“PST”)
  • Private Securities Transactions of an Associated Person”
  • Prohibited Transactions
  • Prudence
  • Quantitative Suitability
  • Reading Health v. JP Morgan, No. 16-4234 (3d Cir. Aug. 7, 2018)
  • Reasonable Fees
  • Recommendation
  • Regulation Best Interest
  • Regulation SHO
  • Regulatory Notice 18-13
  • Retirement Account
  • Risk
  • Rollovers
  • SEC
  • SEC 2018 National Exam Program Examination Priorities
  • SEC Reg BI
  • SEC RIA Interpretation
  • Securities Act of 1933
  • Securities Class Action
  • Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (SLUSA)
  • Senior Safe Act
  • Seniors
  • Service Providers
  • Short Sales
  • Suitability
  • supervision
  • Supreme Court
  • Surveillance
  • Technology Governance
  • UBS v. Carilion Clinic, 706 F.3d 319(2013)
  • Uncategorized
  • Unit Investment Trusts (“UIT”)
  • Verification of Assets and Liabilities

archives

  • 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
  • 2021
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
  • 2020
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
  • 2019
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
  • 2018
    • December 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
  • 2017
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
  • About Us
  • Contributors
  • Resources
  • Presentations
  • Visit the Faegre Drinker website

© 2022 Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All Rights Reserved. Lawyer Advertising.
Privacy Policy

We use cookies to improve your experience with our website. By browsing our site, you are agreeing to the use of cookies. For more information about how we use cookies, please review our privacy policy and cookie policy. OK
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT