Skip to content

Broker-Dealer Regulation & Litigation Insights

  • About Us
  • Contributors
  • Resources
  • Presentations
  • Visit the Faegre Drinker website

Recommending Rollovers in the Evolving Regulatory Environment (Part 1)

With recent developments in the regulatory landscape – the demise of the DOL Fiduciary Rule, the SEC’s proposed Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI) and RIA fiduciary interpretation, and the existing FINRA guidance on rollovers – it’s important for firms to understand the rules for rollover recommendations. This article discusses the rules as they apply to both broker-dealers and RIAs. While there are similarities in the application, there are also material differences.  

By “rollover” recommendation, we mean a recommendation made to a participant in a retirement plan to take a distribution of his or her account and roll it over to an IRA handled by the broker-dealer or RIA (which in this article we refer to as the “firms”). In this article, we look at the existing ERISA rules in light of the 5th Circuit’s decision vacating the Fiduciary Rule, and then review existing FINRA guidance on rollover recommendations. In Parts 2 and 3, we’ll discuss the SEC’s proposals for broker-dealers and RIAs and where that may take firms in the future, as well as how to comply with the rules when making a rollover recommendation.

In 2005, the DOL opined that a rollover recommendation is not fiduciary advice under ERISA. On the other hand, it said that if an advisor is already a fiduciary to a plan, a rollover recommendation is considered a fiduciary act, which subjects the advisor to the ERISA fiduciary and prohibited transaction rules. The DOL did an about-face when it issued its new Fiduciary Rule, saying that the recommendation was fiduciary advice, so that even if an advisor was not a plan fiduciary, he or she became a fiduciary for that recommendation. But since the Fiduciary Rule is now gone, the 2005 advisory opinion re-emerges as the controlling guidance.

This re-emergence means that firms need to assess whether they and their advisors are plan fiduciaries. RIA services to plans would usually satisfy the “five-part test” used to determine whether someone is giving ERISA fiduciary investment advice. Assuming the RIA is a fiduciary to the plan, this means that it and its advisors would also be fiduciaries under ERISA for rollover recommendations. Even if they are not fiduciaries for ERISA purposes, they would nonetheless be fiduciaries to participants in that plan.

Depending on the facts, broker-dealer services may or may not constitute fiduciary investment advice. Broker-dealers will need to carefully assess their advisors’ services to plans to determine whether the advisors and the broker-dealer are fiduciaries to the plans and therefore are fiduciaries for rollover recommendations to participants in that plan.

Even if the broker-dealer and its advisor are not fiduciaries under ERISA, they are still governed by FINRA’s rules, which are in FINRA Regulatory Notice 13-45. In that Notice, FINRA said that a rollover recommendation is inherently a recommendation about the purchase, sale or holding of securities, which triggers application of Rule 2111, the suitability rule. Regarding rollover recommendations, FINRA said:

A recommendation to roll over plan assets to an IRA rather than keeping assets in a previous employer’s plan or rolling over to a new employer’s plan should reflect consideration of various factors, the importance of which will depend on an investor’s individual needs and circumstances.

It then listed factors to be considered and compared, including differences in the plan and the proposed IRA regarding investment options, fees and expenses, services, penalty-free withdrawals, creditor protection and required minimum distribution requirements.

FINRA also provided what amounts to an admonishment about how an advisor should approach the recommendation:

If Rule 2111 is triggered, a registered representative must have a reasonable basis to believe that the recommendation is suitable for the customer, based on information about the options obtained through reasonable diligence, and taking into account factors such as tax implications, legal ramifications, and differences in services, fees and expenses between the retirement savings alternatives. [Emphasis added]

The factors to be considered, including those at the end of that quote, are similar to the approach taken by the DOL in its vacated Fiduciary Rule. Put another way, to the extent a firm modified its procedures and policies with a view to complying with the DOL rule for rollover recommendations, it may want to consider the requirements of 13-45 before reverting to its prior practices.

FINRA acknowledged in Notice 13-45 that some firms only permit advisors to provide educational information about rollovers (which is consistent with the DOL position). In those cases, FINRA said, firms should adopt measures reasonably designed to ensure that the firm and its advisors do not make recommendations. Those measures should include training, consideration of compensation arrangements that could cause an advisor to make a recommendation, and monitoring advisor communications to ensure that the prohibition against rollover recommendations is not compromised.

Where does this leave firms today? FINRA’s suitability rules apply to the recommendations, so firms need to follow the Notice 13-45 guidance. Firms also need to assess whether they are plan fiduciaries under the DOL’s five-part test. If they are, the recommendation is also subject to the ERISA fiduciary and prohibited transaction rules.

The bottom line is that firms need to carefully consider existing requirements in developing a compliance approach for recommending or educating participants about rollovers.

The material contained in this communication is informational, general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. The material contained in this communication should not be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances. This communication was published on the date specified and may not include any changes in the topics, laws, rules or regulations covered. Receipt of this communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions, this communication may be considered attorney advertising.

Subscribe and Receive Alerts to New Articles

SUBSCRIBE
August 9, 2018
Written by: Fred Reish
Category: DOL Fiduciary Rule, Fiduciary Duty, FINRA, FINRA Notice 13-45, IRA, Recommendation, Rollovers

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: FINRA Regulatory Notice Encourages Member Firms to Voluntarily Provide Information on Their Digital Asset Activities
Next Next post: Bye-Bye Bureaucracy, Hello Enforcement: FINRA Shakes Up the Structure of its Department of Enforcement

Subscribe to Alerts

Recent Posts

  • New Year’s Priorities: FINRA Releases its 2023 Report on its Examination and Risk Monitoring Program
  • Managing IRAs: Charging Different Fees for Different Investments
  • FINRA Is Conducting a Targeted Exam of “Crypto Assets”
  • Recent State Fiduciary and Best Interest Developments
  • Rollover Recommendations – Do the SEC and DOL Requirements Align?

Categories

  • 12b-1 Fees
  • 3270
  • 3280
  • 3290
  • Anti-Money Laundering
  • Arbitration
  • BD
  • Best Execution
  • Best Interest Contract Exemption
  • Best Interest Standard of Care
  • Business Continuity Planning
  • Churning
  • Class Certification
  • Compensation Issues
  • Compliance
  • Concurrent jurisdiction
  • Conflicts of Interest
  • Congress
  • Covered class actions
  • Covered securities
  • Credit
  • Cryptocurrencies
  • Customer Due Diligence Rule
  • Customer Protection
  • Cybersecurity
  • Dark Pools
  • Data Integrity
  • DOL Fiduciary Rule
  • Elder Abuse
  • Enforcement
  • Event Study
  • Examination
  • Exchange-Traded Funds (“ETF”)
  • exemptions
  • Fair Pricing
  • Fees
  • Fiduciary
  • Fiduciary Duty
  • Financial Services
  • FinCEN
  • FINRA
  • FINRA 2018 Annual Regulatory and Examination Priorities Letter
  • FINRA 360
  • FINRA Code of Arbitration Procedure 12204
  • FINRA Code of Arbitration Procedure 13204
  • FINRA Notice 13-45
  • FINRA Regulatory Notice 16-25
  • FINRA Rule 12200
  • FINRA Rule 13200
  • FINRA Rule 2111
  • FINRA Rule 2165
  • FINRA Rule 2232
  • FINRA Rule 3310(c)
  • FINRA Rule 4210
  • FINRA Rule 4512
  • FINRA Summary Report
  • Fixed Income
  • Fraud
  • Goldman v. City of Reno, 747 F.3d 733(2014)
  • Goldman v. Golden Empire Schools Financing, 767 F.3d 210(2014)
  • IA
  • Impartial Conduct Standards
  • In the Matter of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Respondent (AWC 2009020188101/January 25, 2012)
  • Initial Coin Offerings
  • Investment Recommendation
  • Investor
  • IRA
  • Liquidity
  • Manipulation
  • Margin
  • Market Access
  • Market Access Controls
  • Mortgage
  • Mutual Funds
  • New FINRA Rule
  • OCIE
  • Office of the Solicitor General
  • Options
  • Outside Activities
  • Outside Business Activities (“OBA”)
  • Policies and Procedures
  • Price Impact
  • Private Securities Transactions (“PST”)
  • Private Securities Transactions of an Associated Person”
  • Prohibited Transactions
  • Prudence
  • Quantitative Suitability
  • Reading Health v. JP Morgan, No. 16-4234 (3d Cir. Aug. 7, 2018)
  • Reasonable Fees
  • Recommendation
  • Regulation Best Interest
  • Regulation SHO
  • Regulatory Notice 18-13
  • Retirement Account
  • Risk
  • Rollovers
  • SEC
  • SEC 2018 National Exam Program Examination Priorities
  • SEC Reg BI
  • SEC RIA Interpretation
  • Securities Act of 1933
  • Securities Class Action
  • Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (SLUSA)
  • Senior Safe Act
  • Seniors
  • Service Providers
  • Short Sales
  • Suitability
  • supervision
  • Supreme Court
  • Surveillance
  • Technology Governance
  • UBS v. Carilion Clinic, 706 F.3d 319(2013)
  • Uncategorized
  • Unit Investment Trusts (“UIT”)
  • Verification of Assets and Liabilities

archives

  • 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
  • 2022
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
  • 2021
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
  • 2020
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
  • 2019
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
  • 2018
    • December 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
  • 2017
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
  • About Us
  • Contributors
  • Resources
  • Presentations
  • Visit the Faegre Drinker website

© 2023 Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All Rights Reserved. Lawyer Advertising.
Privacy Policy

We use cookies to improve your experience with our website. By browsing our site, you are agreeing to the use of cookies. For more information about how we use cookies, please review our privacy policy and cookie policy. OK
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT